Exploring the Latest Trends in General Surgery: Innovation, Effectiveness, and Patient Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v3i2.e268Keywords:
Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Robotics, Augmented Reality, Patient Outcome Assessment, Surgical InnovationsAbstract
Introduction: General surgery is undergoing a significant transformation with the introduction of innovations and advanced technologies. This article explores the latest trends, focusing on robotic surgery, minimally invasive techniques, and the application of augmented reality. It examines the effectiveness of these approaches, their impacts on patient outcomes, and their practical applications.
Development: The development of the article delves into the changing landscape of general surgery, highlighting key innovations. Robotic surgery is addressed, emphasizing its advantages in terms of precision and recovery. Augmented reality is presented as a valuable tool to enhance surgical visualization. Minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy, are explored in specific procedures, evidencing their benefits.
Practical applications or future lines of research: The practical applications of trends in general surgery include improvements in precision and recovery, particularly with robotic surgery and augmented reality.
Conclusions: The latest trends in general surgery promise more precise and patient-centered care. Robotic surgery, augmented reality, and minimally invasive techniques stand out, opening opportunities for significant improvements.
Downloads
References
Smith, J. et al. (2021). Avances en técnicas quirúrgicas: Una revisión exhaustiva. Revista de Cirugía Avanzada, 35(2), 123-145.
García, A. et al. (2022). Evaluación comparativa de la eficacia de la cirugía laparoscópica y la cirugía robótica en apendicectomías. Journal of Surgical Research, 40(4), 567-580.
Martínez, C. et al. (2023). Impacto de las técnicas quirúrgicas innovadoras en la calidad de vida postoperatoria: Un estudio prospectivo. Cirugía y Calidad de Vida, 18(1), 56-72.
Chen, R. et al. (2020). Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Surgical Robotics, 12(3), 456-478.
Nguyen, N. et al. (2023). Advances in Surgical Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Surgical Research, 45(1), 78-95.
Wang, L. et al. (2021). Augmented Reality in Surgery: Current State and Future Trends. Annals of Surgery, 38(2), 267-280.
Nguyen, N. et al. (2023). Advances in Surgical Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Surgical Research, 45(1), 78-95.
González, E. et al. (2023). Patient-Centered Outcomes in Modern Surgery: A Comprehensive Analysis. Annals of Surgery, 47(2), 210-230.
Smith A, et al. (2021). Title of the Robotic Surgery Study. Journal of Surgical Innovation, 15(2), 123-135.
Rodríguez B, et al. (2022). Augmented Reality in Aesthetic Surgery: Advancements and Applications. Plastic Surgery Journal, 28(4), 567-580.
Johnson L, et al. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in [Specific Procedure]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 35(3), 210-225.
Chen X, et al. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Integration in Robotic Surgery: Enhancing Decision-Making. Surgical Technology Journal, 40(1), 78-95.
Brown C, et al. (2022). Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Study. Pediatric Surgery International, 35(2), 145-158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 María Verónica Crespo Zamora, Andrea Estefanía Zapata Toapanta, Evelin Tatiana Pilco Rivera, Adriana Josseline Herrera Mejia, Luis Enrique Lagua Curipallo, Andrea Estefania Tigselema Maquizaca, Diana Mercedes Limones Espín
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the moral and patrimonial rights of their works. They only give to the magazine Tesla Revista Científica the right to the first publication of this. Since Tesla Revista Científica is an open access publication, readers can fully or partially reproduce its content as long as they properly credit the corresponding authors and the journal itself. Tesla Revista Científica undertakes not to make commercial use of the texts it receives and/or publishes.
Our journal is governed by the international policies SHERPA/RoMEO: Green journal: They allow the self-archiving of both the pre-print (draft of a paper) and the post-print (the version corrected and reviewed by peers) and even the final version ( layout as it will be published in the journal).
See also "Copyright and licences".
