Modern digital technologies in education: transforming learning environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v5i2.e512Keywords:
student competencies, educational methodologies, educational technologies, innovative toolsAbstract
Given the global changes in education and the demands of an international and globalized labor market, there is an urgent need to adopt innovative strategies to develop students with key competencies. The educational environment at all levels must be transformed by integrating methods that respond to this new reality. The study presented seeks to analyze the potential of modern pedagogical and methodological practices to strengthen educational quality and prepare students with relevant competencies for employment opportunities. Contemporary approaches aimed at developing competencies, such as critical thinking, leadership, digital and communication skills, in personalized learning environments have been reviewed. Essential factors for the development of competitive human capital are identified, highlighting the importance of integrating methods such as project-based learning, gamification, portfolios, mentoring, storytelling, interdisciplinary research, and learning through argumentation. Competency development cannot be based solely on traditional methods; a systemic integration of traditional and innovative approaches is necessary, with a strong personalization of the educational process, which allows for the development of professionals prepared for the challenges of today's world.
Downloads
References
Aguayo, C., & Eames, C. (2023). Using mixed reality (XR) immersive learning to enhance environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 54(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2152410
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
Arguedas, N. Z. (2011). La educación ante el enfoque sistémico. Revista Posgrado y Sociedad, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22458/rpys.v11i2.2220
Arifin, Y., Sastria, T. G., & Barlian, E. (2018). User Experience Metric for Augmented Reality Application: A Review. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 648-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.221
Baird, A. M., & Parayitam, S. (2019). Employers’ ratings of importance of skills and competencies college graduates need to get hired: Evidence from the New England region of USA. Education + Training, 61(5), 622-634. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2018-0250
Bandura, A., & Wessels, S. (1997). Self-efficacy. Cambridge University Press.
Calle, D. F. G., Salazar, Y. A. M., Tumbaco, C. A. A., & Salazar, L. L. Z. (2024). Aplicación de las TIC para fomentar la creatividad y la producción de textos en clases de lenguaje. Revista Social Fronteriza, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(3)285
Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1379-1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9
Cuadros González, L. Y., & López Niño, A. del P. (2020). Gamificación como estrategia para fortalecer la producción textual en Ciencias Naturales*. Revista Docencia Universitaria, 21(1), Article 1.
Fatima, D. N., Zahid, F., & Ullah, I. (2024). Role of Discussion teaching technique in improving English language speaking skills of ESL learners. Jahan-e-Tahqeeq, 7(1), Article 1.
Fivush, R., & Kellas, J. K. (2025). Parental and Family Storytelling Across the Generations: An Interdisciplinary Review. Parenting, 25(2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2025.2450497
Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2023). Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1135-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2022). Desarrollo de estados de la cuestión robustos: Revisiones Sistemáticas de Literatura. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 23, e28600-e28600. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600
Greene, J. A., Copeland, D. Z., & Deekens, V. M. (2021). A Model of Technology Incidental Learning Effects. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 883-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09575-5
Keller, J. (2021). Keller’s ARCS Model | EBSCO Research Starters. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/kellers-arcs-model
Kennedy, T. J., & Sundberg, C. W. (2020). 21st Century Skills. En B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice: An Introductory Guide to Learning Theory (pp. 479-496). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32
Lemes Batista, A., & Cáceres Giraud, A. (2006). Enfoque de la interdisciplinaridad y transdisciplinaridad en la enseñanza de la Economía Política. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 41(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie4112480
Liker, L., Barić, D., Perić Hadžić, A., & Bačnar, D. (2025). Profiling Students by Perceived Immersion: Insights from VR Engine Room Simulator Trials in Maritime Higher Education. Applied Sciences, 15(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073786
Londoño Pérez, M. D. (2025). Lectura Crítica en Educación Secundaria: Una revisión sistemática de prácticas educativa transdisciplinares. Revista Latinoamericana de Calidad Educativa, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.70625/rlce/115
López-Morocho, L. R., & Baquerizo, C. P. J. (2025). El rol del método inductivo como vínculo entre las teorías educativas y las prácticas de aula. Sophía, 38, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n38.2025.01
Lozada-Yánez, R., La-Serna-Palomino, N., & Molina-Granja, F. (2019). Augmented Reality and MS-Kinect in the Learning of Basic Mathematics: KARMLS Case. International Education Studies, 12(9), 54-69.
Lozada-Yánez, R., La-Serna-Palomino, N., Molina-Granja, F., & Veloz-Cherrez, D. (2022). Model for Augmented Reality Applications with Gestural Interface for Children (MARAGIC). Journal of Positive School Psychology, 10311-10330.
Lozada-Yanez, R. M., Yungan-Cazar, J. C., Santillán-Lima, J. C., Caichug-Rivera, D. M., & Molina-Granja, F. (2024). El uso de las TIC en el proceso de enseñanza- aprendizaje de los estudiantes de Ecuador. Universidad y Sociedad, 16(3), Article 3.
Nohlen, D. (2020). El método comparativo. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/13/6180/5.pdf#:~:text=I,m%C3%A9todo%20comparativo%20en%20escritos%20metodol%C3%B3gicos
Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2
Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., Ismail, F., & BiS, U. (2021). Digital Technologies in Education 4.0. Does it Enhance the Effectiveness of Learning? http://localhost/jspui/handle/123456789/25661
Ramos-Bañobre, J. M., Rhea-González, B. S., Pla-López, R. V., & Abreu-Valdivia, O. (2016). La sistematización como metodología, método y resultado científico investigativo en la práctica educativa. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349735025_LA_SISTEMATIZACION_COMO_METODOLOGIA_METODO_Y_RESULTADO_CIENTIFICO_INVESTIGATIVO_EN_LA_PRACTICA_EDUCATIVA
Ruiz-Mendoza, K. K. R. (2024). Reflexiones conceptuales: Método comparativo, Investigación Comparativa en Educación, ¿Educación o Pedagogía Comparada? Revista Española de Educación Comparada, 44, Article 44. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.44.2024.35815
Santillán-Lima, J. C., Caichug-Rivera, D. M., Molina-Granja, F., Lozada-Yanez, R., & Luna-Encalada, W. G. (2021). Estilos de aprendizaje de los estudiantes de ingeniería en tecnologías de la información de la Espoch sede Orellana. Dominio de las Ciencias, 7(4), 2081-2095.
Santillán-Lima, J., Molina, F., Rocha, C., Vásconez-Barrera, F., Guerrero, K., & LlangaVargas, A. (2017). Las Redes Sociales como Herramienta Académica en las Universidades del Centro del País. Revista investigar, 5ta Edición, ESPOCH.
Santillán Lima, J. C., Llanga Vargas, A., Mayorga, W., & Valdiviezo, S. (2016). Evaluación del requerimiento tecnológico para servicios educativos, propuesta de infraestructura de red inalámbrica del Campus La Dolorosa de la Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo. II Congreso Internacional Educación Contemporanea, Calidad Educativa y Buen Vivir. In II Congreso Internacional Educación Contemporanea, Calidad Educativa y Buen Vivir.
Seufert, C., Oberdörfer, S., Roth, A., Grafe, S., Lugrin, J.-L., & Latoschik, M. E. (2022). Classroom management competency enhancement for student teachers using a fully immersive virtual classroom. Computers & Education, 179, 104410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104410
Sinyaeva, О., Крекот, М., Завгородній, О., Сичова, Т., Сичов, А., & Синяєва, О. (2023). ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ІНФОРМАЦІЙНИХ ТЕХНОЛОГІЙ В ОСВІТІ. Освіта. Інноватика. Практика, 11(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol11i7-013
Susanty, L., Hartati, Z., Sholihin, R., Syahid, A., & Liriwati, F. Y. (2021). Why English teaching truth on digital trends as an effort for effective learning and evaluation: Opportunities and challenges: analysis of teaching English. Linguistics and Culture Review, 303-316. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1401
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Javier Iván Moreno-Barreno, Cesar Augusto Hidalgo-Proaño, Doris Maricela Ruiz Barahona, Raúl Fernando Salazar Mendez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the moral and patrimonial rights of their works. They only give to the magazine Tesla Revista Científica the right to the first publication of this. Since Tesla Revista Científica is an open access publication, readers can fully or partially reproduce its content as long as they properly credit the corresponding authors and the journal itself. Tesla Revista Científica undertakes not to make commercial use of the texts it receives and/or publishes.
Our journal is governed by the international policies SHERPA/RoMEO: Green journal: They allow the self-archiving of both the pre-print (draft of a paper) and the post-print (the version corrected and reviewed by peers) and even the final version ( layout as it will be published in the journal).
See also "Copyright and licences".
