Español
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v4i1.e273Keywords:
Estudiantes universitarios, benevolente, hostil, religiosidad, sexismoAbstract
Ambivalent sexism is a social problem that visualizes women as inferior to men because of their sex and gender roles, which is subdivided into two dimensions: hostile sexism and benevolent sexism. For its part, religiosity also has unequal ideologies regarding the role of men and women in society, which promote inequality in the conditions and quality of life of both sexes. Therefore, to determine the relationship between ambivalent sexism and religiosity in university students, a non-experimental cross-sectional study of correlational scope was carried out in a non-probabilistic sample of 296 university students, to whom the ambivalent sexism scale (ASI) and the Age Universal I-E scale of religious orientation were applied, whose results confirmed that there is a positive relationship between ambivalent sexism, intrinsic religiosity and extrinsic personal religiosity and that ambivalent sexism is significantly higher in men than in women.
Downloads
References
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 5(4), 432. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
Almanza-Muñoz, J., Monroy-Puente, M., Bimbela, A., & Holland, J. C. (1999). La incorporación de la espiritualidad en el cuidado de los enfermos y sus familias. Revista de Sanidad Militar, 53(5). https://www.academia.edu/44664682/La_incorporaci%C3%B3n_de_la_espiritualidad_en_el_cuidado_de_los_enfermos_y_sus_familias#:~:text=En%20el%20presente%20trabajo%20se%20explora%20en%20v%C3%ADnculo,espiritual%20en%20su%20pr%C3%A1ctica%20cotidiana%20con%20sus%20enfermos.
Bonilla-Algovia, E. (2021). Acceptance of ambivalent sexism in trainee teachers in Spain and Latin America countries. Anales de Psicología, 37(2), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.441791
Cardenas, Manuel, Gonzales, Carmen, Lay, Siu-Lin, Calderón, Carlos, & Alegría, Isabel. (2010). Inventario de sexismo ambivalente: Aceptación, validación y relación con variables psicosociales. Bing. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4397/439742463006.pdf
Ceylan-Batur, S., Sakallı, N., & Gunaratne, S. (2023). Predictors of tolerating violence against women: Honor concerns and fundamentalist religious orientation. Current Psychology, 42(12), 9720–9733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02276-4
de Azavedo Coutinho, K. de A., Raimundo Yaegashi, S. F. R., & de Oliveira, I. (2022). Bullying homofóbico e religiosidade: Representações sociais de acadêmicos do Curso de Pedagogia. 27. https://doi.org/: http://dx.doi.org/10.20435/serie-estudos.v27i60.1525
de Vicuña, Aitor Urbina García, M., de Morentin, Juan Ignacio Martínez, & Foronda Rojo, Ainize. (2020). Estilos de religiosidad y valores de universitarios y universitarias de Esmeraldas, Ecuador. https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=94477
de Zavala, A. G., & Bierwiaczek, K. (2021). Male, National, and Religious Collective Narcissism Predict Sexism. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01193-3
Delegación del Gobierno contra la Violencia de Género. (2019). Macroencuesta de Violencia contra la Mujer 2019. Ministerio de Igualdad. https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/macroencuesta2015/Macroencuesta2019/
Expósito, F., Moya, M. C., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. Revista de Psicología Social, 13(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347498760350641
Fernández, S., Arias Gallegos, W., & Alvarado, M. (2017). La escala de sexismo ambivalente en estudiantes de dos universidades de Arequipa. Avances en Psicología, 25, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.33539/avpsicol.2017.v25n1.138
Fihris, Education Faculty of Education and Teacher Training. (2020). The Effect of Academic Background and Religious Orientation to Religious Fundamentalism among University Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/Nadwa/article/view/6118/pdf
García-Alandete, J., Rosa Martínez, E., Sellés Nohales, P., & Soucase Lozano, B. (gr). Orientación religiosa y sentido de la vida. Universitas Psychologica, 12(2), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy12-2.orsv
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Osagie, J. E., Akande, A., Alao, A., Annetje, B., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Expósito, F., … López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
González Villanueva, M., & Reyes Lagunes, I. (2015). Orientación Religiosa, Identidad Grupal y Religiosidad como Predictores del Fundamentalismo Religioso. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 5(2), 1984–1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-4719(15)30018-1
González-Rivera, I., & Díaz-Loving, R. (2020). Efecto de la creencia en el mundo justo sobre el sexismo ambivalente. Psicología Iberoamericana, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.48102/pi.v27i2.49
Gorsuch, R. L., & Venable, G. D. (1983). Development of an “Age Universal” I-E Scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385677
Hannover, B., Gubernath, J., Schultze, M., & Zander, L. (2018). Religiosity, Religious Fundamentalism, and Ambivalent Sexism Toward Girls and Women Among Adolescents and Young Adults Living in Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02399
Hellmer, K., Stenson, J. T., & Jylhä, K. M. (2018). What’s (not) underpinning ambivalent sexism?: Revisiting the roles of ideology, religiosity, personality, demographics, and men’s facial hair in explaining hostile and benevolent sexism. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.001
Herrera, S. F., & Payihuanca, M. A. (2019). Sexismo ambivalente y violencia en relaciones de enamoramiento en universitarios de Arequipa. 9. https://revistas.ucsp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/299/325
Hurtarte, C. A., & Pulido, D. P. (2021). Masculinidad y religiosidad en hombres jóvenes de las escuelas religiosas y laicas. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/epsicologia/epi-2021/epi212e.pdf
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. (2019). Violencia de Género |. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/violencia-de-genero/
Janos, E., & Espinosa, A. (2018). Sexismo ambivalente y su relación con la aceptación de mitos sobre la violencia sexual en una muestra de Lima. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?pid=S2223-30322018000100006&script=sci_arttext
Kuyel, N., Cesur, S., & Ellison, C. G. (2012). Religious Orientation and Mental Health: A Study with Turkish University Students. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.2466/02.09.PR0.110.2.535-546
León, C. M., & Aizpurúa, E. (2020). ¿Persisten Las Actitudes Sexistas En Los Estudiantes Universitarios? Un Análisis De Su Prevalencia, Predictores Y Diferencias De Género. Educación XX1, 23(1), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.23629
Maltby, J. (2002). The Age Universal I-E Scale-12 and Orientation Toward Religion: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Journal of Psychology, 136(5), 555–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980209605550
Manoussaki, K., & Hayne, A. (2019). Authoritarianism, social dominance, religiosity and ambivalent sexism as predictors of rape myth acceptance. International journal of gender and women’s studies, 7(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v7n1p10
Naciones Unidas. (2021, octubre 18). La misoginia y el sexismo se agudizan en el mundo, advierte experta. https://news.un.org/es/story/2021/10/1498542
Nisar, S., Zafar, K., Batool, Dr. I., Ishfaq, M., Fatima, H., Fatima, K., & Arshad, R. (2021). Ambivalent Sexism towards Women and Acceptance of Rape Myths among University Students. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjhss.2021.v06i02.007
Nuñez-Peña Isabel. (2011). Diseño de investigación en psicología. https://www.rua.unam.mx/portal/recursos/ficha/8370/diseno-de-investigacion-en-psicologia#:~:text=Manual%20para%20el%20dise%C3%B1o%20de%20investigaci%C3%B3n%20en%20psicolog%C3%ADa,son%20los%20experimentales%2C%20cuasi%20experimentales%20y%20no%20experimentales.
Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2021). Violencia contra la mujer. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
Organización Panamericana de la salud. (2012). Violencia contra las mujeres en América Latina y el Caribe: Análisis comparativo de datos poblacionales de 12 países. https://www.paho.org/es/documentos/violencia-contra-mujeres-america-latina-caribe-analisis-comparativo-datos-poblacionales
Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227–232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037
Oxfam International. (2018). Rompiendo Moldes: Transformar imaginarios y normas sociales para eliminar la violencia contra las mujeres. https://www.oxfam.org/es/informes/rompiendo-moldes
Özdemir, F. (2016). The predictive power of religious orientation types on ambivalent sexism. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 4, 89–107. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-04-07-05
Pareek, B., & Dhanda, D. S. (2022). To Gain Insight into the Relationships among Religious Fundamentalism, Ambivalent Sexism, and Gender Role Beliefs in Young Adults. IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, 10(1), 19–25.
Portillo, D. S. (2022). Relación de sexismo ambivalente y variables sociodemográficas en Adultos de gran Asunción. http://revistas.une.edu.py/index.php/revista_une/article/view/143#:~:text=El%20presente%20estudio%20tuvo%20por%20objetivo%20determinar%20la,se%20utiliz%C3%B3%20el%20muestreo%20no%20probabil%C3%ADstico%20por%20conveniencia.
Prina, F., & Schatz-Stevens, J. N. (2020). Sexism and Rape Myth Acceptance: The Impact of Culture, Education, and Religiosity. Psychological Reports, 123(3), 929–951. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119826896
Renzetti, C. M., Lynch, K. R., & DeWall, C. N. (2018). Ambivalent Sexism, Alcohol Use, and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515604412
Reyes-Solano, F. E., & Castaños-Cervantes, S. (2022). Sexismo Ambivalente como Correlato y Predictor de la Agresión Psicológica. Revista Lasallista de Investigación, 18(1), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v18n1a17
Rodríguez-Burbano, A. Y., Cepeda, I., Vargas-Martínez, A. M., & De-Diego-Cordero, R. (2021). Assessment of Ambivalent Sexism in University Students in Colombia and Spain: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1009. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031009
Simkin, H., & Etchezahar, E. (2013). Las Orientaciones Religiosas Extrínseca e Intrínseca: Validación de la “Age Universal” IE Scale en el Contexto Argentino The Extrinsic and Intrinsic Religious Orientations: Validation of the “Age Universal” IE Scale. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/27351#:~:text=Con%20el%20objetivo%20de%20explorar%20la%20dimensionalidad%20de,de%20una%20universidad%20de%20Buenos%20Aires%2C%20seleccionados%20intencionalmente.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marilyn GIsley Mata Campaña, Fanny Gavilanes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the moral and patrimonial rights of their works. They only give to the magazine Tesla Revista Científica the right to the first publication of this. Since Tesla Revista Científica is an open access publication, readers can fully or partially reproduce its content as long as they properly credit the corresponding authors and the journal itself. Tesla Revista Científica undertakes not to make commercial use of the texts it receives and/or publishes.
Our journal is governed by the international policies SHERPA/RoMEO: Green journal: They allow the self-archiving of both the pre-print (draft of a paper) and the post-print (the version corrected and reviewed by peers) and even the final version ( layout as it will be published in the journal).
See also "Copyright and licences".
